![]() ![]() 2 I'll take that, thanks very much.įootnotes were also irritating. Put that in a paragraph a few times and start to regret it. To do this in April last year, with the theme I had chosen, I needed to write a whole load of Liquid tags like this. Back ticks format the text inside as code style text, and full chunks of R code (or other languages) can be placed inside three backticks with the accompanying name of the language afterwards inside two curly braces. In R Markdown, code (naturally) and equations are easy to format. ![]() Feel free to skip to the setup guide to get started. I found the guides on the process (blogdown-focused, that is) to have some errors 1, so I will explain each step in getting your own GitHub pages blog, built by blogdown in RStudio, for anybody who is interested. This post is an explanation of why I moved to Hugo and specifically to blogdown. I picked a theme I liked, all good, but I soon realised that writing as I often do in R Markdown was a little less convenient in the GitHub-flavoured markdown → \rightarrow → jekyll → \rightarrow → theme → \rightarrow → website process. Setting it up was at times frustrating, but a good learning process (I especially picked up a lot of Git through that experience). Since April or so of last year, I've had a personal website on GitHub pages, where I keep this blog and a few other things. Update: for some people who may have some issues setting up the blog the way I've set out here, see Kate's helpful comments below. You have two possible choices for setting up this repository locally.How to make a GitHub pages blog with RStudio and Hugo Your public/ directory should be the GIT repository. 32 GitHub offers a free subdomain, and you can use your own domain name by configuring its A or CNAME records to point it to GitHub Pages (consult the GitHub Pages documentation for instructions). To make sure GitHub does not rebuild your website using Jekyll and just publish whatever files you push to the repository, you need to create a (hidden) file named. The comprehensive documentation of GitHub Pages is at, and please ignore anything related to Jekyll there unless you actually use Jekyll instead of Hugo. The first requirement for using GitHub Pages is that you have to create a GitHub repository named under your account (replace username with your actual GitHub username), and what’s left is to push your website files to this repository. ![]() The actual limitation is that you cannot use subpaths in the URL but you can use any (sub)domain names.Īlthough GitHub does not officially support Hugo (only Jekyll is supported), you can actually publish any static HTML files on GitHub Pages, even if they are not built with Jekyll. ![]() However, since you can connect any GitHub repositories with Netlify, and each repository can be associated with a domain or subdomain name, you may replace GitHub Project Pages with different subdomains like and. This feature allows you to have project websites in separate repositories, e.g., you may have two independent websites and, corresponding to GitHub repositories username/proj-a and username/proj-b, respectively. This is extremely useful when someone else (or even yourself) proposes changes to your website, since you have a chance to see what the website would look like before you merge the pull request.īasically, Netlify can do everything that GitHub Pages can, but there is still one little missing feature, which is closely tied to GitHub itself, which is GitHub Project Pages. One of the best features of Netlify that is not available with GitHub Pages is that Netlify can generate a unique website for preview when a GitHub pull request is submitted to your GitHub repository. 31 This is important especially when you have an old website that you want to migrate to Hugo some links may be broken, in which case you can easily redirect them with Netlify. Redirecting URLs is awkward with GitHub Pages but much more straightforward with Netlify. We recommend that you consider Netlify Hugo due to these reasons: GitHub Pages ( ) is a very popular way to host static websites (especially those built with Jekyll), but its advantages are not obvious or appealing compared to Netlify.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |